Diversity Demands: Segregate Now!

The more white Israelite people try to ignore the issues of race, the more race will get in our face (Dan. 9:11). It is in the best interests of every race to SEGREGATE NOW.

Ideally, Blacks (for example) would have enough self-esteem to voluntarily return to Africa - their ROOTS - and build up there with all the know-how they've received (or were offered) in the United States - the biblical inheritance of Joseph.

To build upon comments by the Mayor of New Orleans, see Chocolate Continent Awaits the Great Black Return!

However, this issue is not just about black and white. The illegal influx of Mexicans must stop and immediately be reversed with their mass expulsion by this "land of laws."

May 1: Illegal Immigration Day Defused!
- otherwise "Law, without force, is impotent" - Cicero.

This is not only about race, but ideally our white Jewish brethren (yes, they are white despite hateful lies about Jews being Khazars, contrary to the clear Scriptures and many biblical prophecies that state otherwise) should voluntarily follow Judaism to the Jewish Homeland, as Judaism requires, to become better Jews and have the unique opportunity to fulfill many more mitzvot (commandments) and be blessed.

Race matters whether folks want to acknowledge it or remain in denial, until it's too late.

A Warning For America From South Africa

Black Racists Slaughter Whites in South Africa - Where's the Outrage?

God bless us all to live within the designated borders of diverse nations our Great Creator has decreed for us, all revolving around the 12 Tribes of Israel whom God alone has called to ultimately become His Servant Nation, a light to all nations, a truly United Kingdom, One Nation Under God.

Deuteronomy 32:8
8 When the Most High divided their inheritance to the nations,When He separated the sons of Adam [even though we're all family],He set the boundaries of the peoplesAccording to the number of the children of Israel.

Acts 17:26
26 And [although] He [God] has made from one blood every nation of men to dwell on all the face of the earth [we're all human]... [yet He] has determined their preappointed times and the boundaries of their dwellings...

FATHER GOD KNOWS BEST, don't you agree?


David Ben-Ariel is a Christian-Zionist writer and author of Beyond Babylon: Europe's Rise and Fall. With a focus on the Middle East and Jerusalem, his analytical articles help others improve their understanding of that troubled region. Check out the Beyond Babylon blog.

Obama's Story of Race and Religion

This insightful article deserves a second look while we still can lest we forget or are pressured to downplay its disturbing truth:

Stephen FlurryColumnist

Obama’s Story of Race and Religion

June 6, 2008 | From theTrumpet.com

Hoping his religious ties to Jeremiah Wright will go away, Barack Obama quietly announced his resignation from Trinity United. But before we dismiss the issue, a look at Obama’s memoirs provides important context.

After receiving enough delegates to secure the Democratic nomination on Tuesday night, Barack Obama said he looked forward to debating John McCain’s very different policies and positions. “It is a debate the American people deserve,” Obama said. “But what you don’t deserve,” he continued, hoping to frame the upcoming presidential debates more narrowly, “is another election that’s governed by fear, and innuendo, and division. What you won’t hear from this campaign or this party is the kind of politics that uses religion as a wedge, and patriotism as a bludgeon—that sees our opponents not as competitors to challenge, but enemies to demonize” (emphasis mine).

It remains to be seen how much of a wedge issue Barack Obama’s disturbing association with Jeremiah Wright will be in the upcoming general election. But if it does factor into the outcome, it is he—not his political opponents—who made it a wedge issue.

Suspicious of Racism

Barack Obama began his 1994 memoir, Dreams From My Father—A Story of Race and Inheritance, by describing the events surrounding the day he learned that his father, who abandoned him at the age of 2, had died. Barack was 21 at the time, living in New York. “When the weather was good,” he remembers, he and his roommate would “sit out on the fire escape to smoke cigarettes and … watch white people from the better neighborhoods nearby walk their dogs down our block to let the animals [defecate] on our curbs ….”

Evidently, life wasn’t easy for mixed-race students at Columbia University in 1981—even those who lived on the upper east side of Manhattan.

Before college, while living in Hawaii, Barack describes an awkward incident during his high school days, when he invited two white friends to attend an all-black party. Early on at the party, the whites became noticeably uncomfortable and asked if Barack could return them home early. During the ride home, one of them made the mistake of saying he could now better identify with Barack’s sojourn as a minority living in a mostly white society. The comment angered Barack, but he managed to suppress the urge to punch the guy. The impact of the incident, however, etched a deep, life-altering scar on Obama’s mental makeup. “I had begun to see a new map of the world, one that was frightening in its simplicity, suffocating in its implication,” he explained.

We were always playing on the white man’s court, Ray [his black friend] had told me, by the white man’s rules. If the principal, or the coach, or a teacher, or Kurt, wanted to spit in your face, he could, because he had power and you didn’t. If he decided not to, if he treated you like a man or came to your defense, it was because he knew that the words you spoke, the clothes you wore, the books you read, your ambitions and desires, were already his. … Following this maddening logic, the only thing you could choose as your own was withdrawal into a smaller and smaller coil of rage, until being black meant only the knowledge of your own powerlessness, of your own defeat.

Not long after the party, adding insult to injury, Barack was shocked to learn that his white grandmother had what Barack believed were predisposed attitudes that were racially insensitive. The revelation jolted him one morning shortly after his grandmother asked her husband, Barack’s grandfather, for a ride to work. The exchange led to an argument which resulted in her finally admitting that she was afraid to ride the bus to work. She had been harassed by a man the day before, she said—and he was black.

“The words were like a fist in my stomach, and I wobbled to regain my composure,” Obama wrote.

That night, Barack related the disturbing news to one of his grandfather’s drinking buddies, an elderly black man named Frank. He told Barack that his grandmother’s reaction to the scary incident on the bus indicated that she understood “that black people have a reason to hate. That’s just how it is,” he said. “So you might as well get used to it.”

Just before Barack left for college, Frank passed along his insight regarding the real price of admission.

“And what’s that?” Barack asked.

“Leaving your race at the door,” Frank said. “Leaving your people behind.”

Later, Frank explained, “They’ll train you so good, you’ll start believing what they tell you about equal opportunity and the American way and all that [nonsense]. They’ll give you a corner office and invite you to fancy dinners, and tell you you’re a credit to your race. Until you want to actually start running things, and then they’ll yank your chain and let you know that you may be a well-trained, well-paid n- - - - -, but you’re a n- - - - - just the same.”

So off to college Barack went, hoping to find his way in this world, while chasing women, smoking pot and occasionally snorting cocaine.

As an undergraduate student at Occidental, located just outside of Pasadena, Calif., Obama was surprised to hear that most of the black community on campus wasn’t interested in revolt and actually didn’t think about race all the time.

“So why couldn’t I let it go?” Obama asks himself.

He chose his friends carefully while at college—befriending the “more politically active black students.” He wanted to avoid the label of being a “sellout.” He enjoyed spending time with the “Marxist professors” and “structural feminists.” He studied Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness to help him better understand how white people learn to hate.

After transferring to Columbia in 1981, he gave up drugs and began to take his studies more seriously. Sobering up, however, did little in the way of suppressing his black rage. “I had grown accustomed, everywhere, to suspicion between the races,” he wrote.

“But whether because of New York’s density or because of its scale, it was only now that I began to grasp the almost mathematical precision with which America’s race and class problems joined; the depth, the ferocity, of resulting tribal wars; the bile that flowed freely not just out on the streets but in the stalls of Columbia’s bathrooms as well.”

While at Columbia, Barack decided he wanted to be a community organizer—a profession that would allow him to make use of his college experience as a black activist. After a lengthy job search which turned up no leads, he finally got a call from a white Chicagoan who had recently started an organizing drive.

During the interview a week later, after asking Barack why he wanted to be an organizer, the man said, “You must be angry about something.”

“What do you mean by that?” Barack asked.

“Don’t get me wrong,” the man later explained. “Anger’s a requirement for the job.”

Obama accepted the job and moved to Chicago in 1985. He worked within several black neighborhoods around Chicago—Roseland, West Pullman and Altgeld Gardens—communities that had been hit hard by the loss of manufacturing jobs. “I started working with both the ministers and the lay people in these churches on issues like creating job-training programs, or after-school programs for youth, or making sure that city services were fairly allocated to under-served communities,” Obama told the Chicago Sun-Times in 2004. “And it was in those places where I think what had been more of an intellectual view of religion deepened.”

Obama’s Spiritual Mentors

In Dreams From My Father, we first meet Jeremiah Wright a little over halfway into the book. But right away, we notice that Pastor Wright is quite unlike all the other deeply flawed male role models who played parts in Barack’s upbringing and education.

Barack has nothing negative to say about his pastor. After meeting him in his office to discuss community organizations, Barack decided to come back for a service one Sunday. As it happens, Wright’s sermon that day carried the same title Obama would borrow for his second best-selling book—“The Audacity of Hope.” In the midst of his message, undoubtedly delivered with the same bombastic style of some of his later, more controversial, sermons, Wright decried the evils of a world “where white folks’ greed runs a world in need.”

The message brought tears to the eyes of Barack Obama. It marked the beginning of an intimate and enduring bond between these two, who seemed to be perfectly matched.

According to the 2004 Sun-Times profile, Barack attended Trinity’s Sunday service every week—“or at least as many weeks as he is able.” The article also identified another long-time associate of the senator’s, a spiritual adviser who helped establish Obama’s moral compass—Michael Pfleger, who, until this week, pastored the St. Sabina Roman Catholic Church on Chicago’s south side.

“I don’t think he could easily divorce his faith from who he is,” Pfleger said of Obama in 2004.

The Anger Is Real

Less than three months ago, when Barack Obama attempted to distance himself from his spiritual mentor and close confidant Jeremiah Wright, the junior senator said his pastor had been misunderstood and unfairly characterized. He said the fact that so many people are “surprised” by Jeremiah Wright’s anger reveals how segregated whites and blacks are during the church hour on Sunday mornings. “[T]he anger is real—it is powerful,” he said in response to Wright’s diatribes. “And to simply wish it away, to condemn it without understanding its roots, only serves to widen the chasm of misunderstanding that exists between the races.”

In his speech, hailed by many in the major media as the best speech on race relations since Martin Luther King, Obama condemned the “controversial” statements of Wright, while maintaining his close personal relationship with the man. “He strengthened my faith, officiated my wedding, and baptized my children,” Obama said. “I can no more disown him than I can disown the black community.”

Two months after that comment, Obama’s other spiritual adviser, Michael Pfleger, mocked Hillary Clinton’s campaign during a message delivered at Trinity United, accusing the New York senator of believing she deserved the nomination simply because she is white.

In response to yet another religious wedge issue, no doubt sensing that his disturbing associations with Trinity United might undermine his political ambitions, Obama did last week what he should have done in March—what he should have done long before that, in fact—he disowned Pastor Wright and Trinity United. Michael Pfleger’s remarks, he explained disingenuously, had caught him by complete surprise.

One commentator tried to brush aside Obama’s disavowal of Wright’s theology as nothing more than politics as usual. It was political opportunism that prompted him to join the church in the first place, just as it was politically expedient for him to leave the church last week, he explained.

But while political opportunism undoubtedly motivated his departure from Trinity United in 2008, Dreams From My Father reveals an altogether different motivation for Barack heeding Jeremiah Wright’s altar call in 1988, and then maintaining a close, father-son relationship with his pastor for the next 20 years.

Ideologically speaking, the two couldn’t have been more perfectly suited for each other.

How the Anger Will End

“[T]he evidence is overwhelming by now that Trinity United is a front for the hard left,” writes James Lewis, “which is trying to turn American blacks into another angry proletariat …. Radical leftists have been teaching ‘race consciousness’ to black people, just as the old left taught ‘class consciousness’ to impoverished people. The stated goal of Black Liberation Theology is to create racial strife, just as the stated goal of Marxist class propaganda was to whip up class war. This is preaching of race hatred for selfish political ends.”

Herbert W. Armstrong wrote of the same issues back in 1968, when student rebellions and racial violence were rampant on American campuses. In the November 1968 Plain Truth, he wrote:

Look, now, at these sudden emotional flare-ups of student revolt and of race consciousness, prejudice, resentments and hatreds. Why the sudden inflaming of student rebellion? Why have both exploded into violence? …

The underlying cause is, simply, human nature. … Human nature is the underlying cause of the strife, the revolt, the violence. But what has triggered it? …

[I]n most cases I can tell you definitely that these riots and student uprisings have been deliberately planned, intentionally provoked, well organized. …

Today Communists appear on college and university campuses, under the guise of “the new leftist movement.”

That old Marxist movement, he explained, worked to inflame blacks with “emotional resentment against whites,” reminding them of every possible “injustice”—fanning the flames of discontent, bitterness and hatred.

We see the same thing happening today.

As much as Obama might claim to disown Trinity United, and to whatever degree his contentious relationship with Jeremiah Wright affects his campaign, the bitter results of today’s movement to stir racial hatred in America are bound to lead to a racial explosion, just as it did during the 1960s. (Read Chapter Four of Ezekiel: The End-Time Prophet to see that this is indeed prophesied.)

Mr. Armstrong, however, went on to give the solution: “These problems will be solved! Our generation shall see world peace!

“But not until human nature is changed! Not until people quit hating one another!”

That time will soon come, he went on to explain, when Jesus Christ returns to this Earth and, by supernatural power and force, brings peace, prosperity and happiness for all! •

Frank Talk About Race

The Curse of Jeremiah Wrights

President Barack Obama sound good to you?

Black to Africa: Facing the Crisis in Black America

Diversity Demands: Segregate Now!

May 1: Illegal Immigration Day Defused!

Chocolate Continent Awaits the Great Black Return!

Martin Luther King Day?

The English-Speaking Nations of White Israelites

THE SIN OF INTERRACIAL MARRIAGE

The Plain Truth About Race And Responsibility

Race Matters


www.DavidBenAriel.org

Race Matters

"Besides these revealed and indicated assignments of government over nations and groups of nations on the national level [during the Reign of Jesus Christ], there will be positions of great magnitude on the international level in the areas of scientific and social functions. And there are a few indications of what some of those operations will be, and the possible--if not probable--personnel.

Since Noah lived first, we now take a look at Noah. In Noah's day, the chief cause of the violence and chaos of world conditions was racial hatreds, interracial marriages, and racial violence caused by man's efforts toward integration and amalgamation of races, contrary to God's laws. God had set the boundary lines for the nations and the races at the beginning (Deut. 32:8-9; Acts 17:26). But men had refused to remain in the lands to which God had assigned them. That was the cause of the corruption and violence that ended that world. For 100 years Noah had preached God's ways to the people--but they didn't heed.

At that time, even as today, that world faced a population explosion. It was when "men began to multiply on the face of the earth" (Gen. 6:1). Jesus said, of our time, right now, "But as the days of Noe [Noah] were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be" (Matt. 24:37)--or, as in Luke 17:26, "And as it was in the days of Noe, so shall it be also in the days of the Son of man." That is, the days just before Christ returns. Today race wars, race hatreds, race riots and race problems are among the world's greatest social troubles.

Noah merely preached to people in his human lifetime. But Noah, in the resurrection, immortal, in power and glory, will be given the power to enforce God's ways in regard to race.

It seems evident that the resurrected Noah will head a vast project of the relocation of the races and nations, within the boundaries God has set, for their own best good, happiness and richest blessings. This will be a tremendous operation. It will require great and vast organization, reinforced with power to move whole nations and races. This time, peoples and nations will move where God has planned for them, and no defiance will be tolerated.

What a paradox. People are going to be forced to be happy, to have peace, to find abundant and joyful living!"

Excerpt from Mystery of the Ages, written by Herbert W. Armstrong (emphasis mine).

As a firm believer in the plain truth of the Bible that Herbert W. Armstrong boldly taught, using it as my basis, I've defended our doctrines in many forums, and share this one example:

I'm sure you're aware that the Bible is an ethnocentric Book dealing with the Hebrew people, the Twelve Tribes of Israel, and only mentions other nations insomuch as they come into contact with our Israelite people. Brit Am Israel reveals the modern identity of these peoples.

There is the NATION and there is the CHURCH. God's Israelite nations have the distinct Law of Moses that grants resident aliens/Gentiles various rights to be treated fairly, own property and such, but not the right to have any say or part in the exercise of the GOVERNMENT. The Voting Rights Act should be repealed and treated as a treacherous and leprous lapse in national judgment.

The Church is Israelite-based (the Root) but gladly includes many Gentiles (Branches) who have been grafted into the spiritual Family and have the same incredible human spiritual potential as Israelites: to be literally born again into the literal Kingdom-Family of God that transcends this flesh. The Church of God needs to clarify and make widely known the biblical position on race and grace.

The Bible is a Christocentric book.

WRONG. The Bible is an ethnocentric book that includes at the heart of its divine message Israel's King would save Israel and Gentiles, "to the Jew first, and also to the Greek" (Romans 1:16). It would be politically-incorrect today to reach out to the Jews (representative of all Israelites) first and then to the Greeks (representative of all Gentiles). But it is biblical!

Romans 9:3-5

3 For I could wish that I myself were accursed from Christ for my brethren, my countrymen according to the flesh, 4 who are Israelites, to whom pertain the adoption, the glory, the covenants, the giving of the law, the service of God, and the promises; 5 of whom are the fathers and from whom, according to the flesh, Christ came, who is over all, the eternally blessed God. Amen.

Some would vainly argue against Paul for even taking note of the legitimate differences or making a distinction between his brethren, his countrymen, and all mankind.

The entire focus of the New Testament is breaking down the divisions between people on the basis of race, class, and status.

Again: There is the NATION and there is the CHURCH.

The same New Testament that breaks down divisions, obstacles in the way of our equal opportunity for entrance into the God Kingdom-Family, still proscribes women preachers, that wives should be submissive to their loving husbands and children obedient to their patient parents and slaves to their masters (1 Corinthians 14:34, 1 Timothy 2:12). There is a biblical order to follow and unique roles for all to play whether in the Church, family or nation (Isaiah 19:25, 1 Corinthians 12:18).

Yet some folks would rather follow their fickle feelings, getting swayed by their emotions, and rebel against the Word and Will of God, refusing to submit, proud and stubborn, failing to see this isn't about their inferiority complexes or others' superiority complexes, but what is right and what is wrong as God has decreed! Men are men, women are women, Israelites are Israelites and Gentiles are Gentiles!

Spiritually we all have an equal opportunity, once called, for various administrative offices in the Kingdom-Family of God. Some former Gentiles and women will be greater than some former Israelites. It's what we do with what God has given us, and God has given us various roles and positions and boundaries to work with within this life of living and learning. Women shouldn't feel jealous of men, or Gentiles of Israelites, or Joseph of Judah or Judah of Joseph, or Israelites of Levites or Levites of Priests. Satan can use a bitter root of anger or resentment, jealousy, covetousness, to defile those who let their guard down. We all have our proper place whether within the Church, nation or our family of nations.

The division of a unified mankid was not a gift, it was punishment for a generation that was arrogant and decided that being unified they would build a tower to the Heavens.

It was both a blessing and a curse. Deuteronomy 32:8 and elsewhere reveals God had predetermined to divide the Earth, the land, with the Israelites uppermost in mind (knowing He would create them) as various inheritances regardless of sin, just as there are divisions within the Holy Land for the Twelve Tribes of Israel that are not divisive (Ezekiel 47:21). And those representative Gentiles, who have adopted our ways, shall remain separate but equal (to a degree), given designated areas as an inheritance (Ezekiel 47:2).

Any warning against intermarriage was on the basis of keeping their religious practices pure, not keeping the race pure.

It appears to be both, as there is DUALITY in Scripture, something physical often representing something spiritual (Ezra 9:2). Genesis 30:34 and 35:2 reveals Laban's family were idol worshippers, including Rachel and Leah. Yet Jacob went out of his way to marry within his own kind, from his own kindred, just like Isaac did (Genesis 24:4, 28:1-2). Any intermarriage is the Bible is documented and is an exception to the rule, and the person follows the religion of Israel.

God did create the races and we do create a beautiful picture... IF... we intermingle. If I handed you a pallate of 100 colors of paint, and you kept those colors separate by huge white spaces on a canvas how beautiful and intricate could your painting be?

God didn't make a mistake in making us each beautiful but not wanting us to blur our own unique colors and characteristics. That is a form of adultery, adulterating, diluting our respective peoples and disrespecting our kinfolk. We're to stay within the bounds that God has set: kind after kind.

We are the body of Christ. One body, one spirit.

Again, that's the CHURCH. Regardless, women still can't preach and it's still "to the Jew first and then to the Greeks." There is an order that we must follow if we're to be faithful to the God of the Hebrews, our Great Creator God, the God of the Bible.

You seem to be implying that there is a racial root -- possibly with biblical origin -- to the poverty and immorality that led to the incident in Toledo.

I believe there is a spiritual root to all sin. We're all sinners and in need of grace. However, aren't you aware that God said He would punish Israelites and Jews with specific Gentiles who would act like animals, culminating in the Gentile confederation of kingdoms led by THE BEAST? Beyond Babylon: Europe's Rise and Fall warns about this rising BEAST POWER IN EUROPE!

Is God racist? Were Isaiah and Daniel and others who referred to various Gentile countries and leaders as animals, racist? Or realist? Does this mean every Gentile is a wild animal? Definitely not! Just as every Israelite certainly isn't a pure lamb! Yet how can God refer to "the worst of the heathen" that HE would bring against our hypocritical Israelite nations if some people aren't worse than others, all things considered?

I don't know you well enough to classify you as a person so I will not do that, but the viewpoint you express here is racist.

I'll gladly be as "racist" as the Bible teaches me to be, however politically incorrect.

There is no question that the Jews are God's chosen people. But the Bible was not written to bring us closer to and to teach us more about the Jews.

The Jews are only a part of the TWELVE Tribes of Israel, as brought out in The United States and Britain in Prophecy, but you're wrong about the Bible isn't written to bring us closer to and teach us more about the Jews. Apparently you disagree with Yeshua's statement that "salvation is of the Jews" and "we know who we worship," and how the Prophets reveal the whole world will soon go after the Jews to learn more about the biblical God and how Israel (all 12 Tribes) will be God's Servant Nation, His Light to all nations, when all nations come up to learn about the God of JACOB-ISRAEL (Zechariah 8:23, Isaiah 2:3).

Please don't be offended at God. God has ordained that the world will learn all about His Plan of Salvation, and His Son, through His People Israel, predominately through the Anglo-Saxon-Celtics and Jews. It's our NATIONAL calling, based on race and grace (Romans 11:28-29).

Gentiles can and must learn and adopt as their own our God-given higher standard for living (1 Corinthians 12:2). It was revealed to us to share with the world!

You are insisting that somehow God does not know that a Caucasian women and an African man can make a beautiful caramel or tan-colored baby that is uniquely beautiful. The same is true of all other races that intermingle.

If God wanted that, He would have created it. Instead we have the three major races and those who have been diluted/adulterated through no fault of their own. Mind you one of my sisters is married to a nice Mexican-American man, and one of my other sisters is married to a white man, and the other yet unmarried only likes black gentlemen (not the ghetto type). And I love all my sisters and their spouses, even though they know I believe IDEALLY we should all stay within our own race, our own God-given natural division.

Celebrate diversity! Don't destroy it. Our God-given differences don't have to divide us. Look at the rainbow where each color remains separate and special!

I am saddened that you distinctly think that the body of Christ is a racial experience when spiritual beings are not bound by definitions like race and ethnicity.

I'm sorry you continue to be blind to the great differences between THE NATION and THE CHURCH. Spiritually minded people are still guided by God's law, trusting Father knows best, and it consistently forbids women preachers and Gentiles aren't to rule over Israelites and every nation has its proper place.

When we're totally spiritual beings, we'll be members of God's Kingdom-Family, having been literally born again, transformed from human to divine, and we'll then transcend the flesh, becoming literal Spirit-Beings just like God the Father and Jesus Christ in character and composition!

It's A Sin To Vote For Obama!

It's A Sin To Vote For Obama! [Full Thread]

54. To: Tenerife (#52)

I know you would rather I and all other non "White Israelites" not be in your country

My parents and grandparents were honorable people, they contributed greatly to their adopted country and I won't allow you and all the other LP racists to slander them and lump them in with thugs.

I don't accept your aberrant interpretation of the Bible, so don't argue your cult talking points to me. I will remain in this society unless God has other plans for my future

Yes, naturally I would want this country founded by White Israelites to be predominately White Israelite, filled with people of color, the color white, as biblically nations are families grown great (which adds to cohesion and unity - not Balkanization).

Why are you guilty of what you're falsely accusing me of? Lumping me in with others who may have slandered your parents and grandparents? I recognize there are many non-whites who have greatly contributed to this White Israelite country and been greatly blessed by being here.
Why is your anger misdirected? You should express your righteous indignation against those thugs you speak of who overshadow whatever good others have done or are doing? I often make mention there are exceptions to the rule, that not all minorities are militant or out to undermine our White Israelite culture, but somehow it usually gets ignored.

Blathering my strong biblical views are "aberrant" doesn't make them so, but exposes how the plain truth often disturbs those in a world of darkness, the light hurts their eyes, especially those in the PC cult and on the PC plantation.
You're free to remain in these "Lands of the Covenant" (Artzot Habrit in Hebrew - the biblical inheritance of Manasseh, the son of Joseph) for now. I'm simply announcing, based upon the Word and Will of God, that in God's good time all will be put in their proper place, will return to where God has ordained they should be, take root and prosper. That's a good thing, a great thing, so why oppose progress or fear it?

Race Matters It seems evident that the resurrected Noah will head a vast project of the relocation of the races and nations, within the boundaries God has set, for their own best good, happiness and richest blessings. This will be a tremendous operation. It will require great and vast organization, reinforced with power to move whole nations and races. This time, peoples and nations will move where God has planned for them, and no defiance will be tolerated.

David Ben-Ariel posted on 2008-08-27 07:51:01 ET Reply Trace